Campaigners have welcomed the possibility of a judicial review of the decision to free serial sex attacker John Worboys on parole.
Government officials say Justice Secretary David Gauke is considering a challenge, but will only proceed if there is a good chance of success.
The Parole Board said it was “confident correct procedures were followed”.
The taxi driver was jailed in 2009 for a minimum of eight years for drugging and sexually assaulting 12 women.
However, it is thought Worboys may have carried out as many as 100 rapes and sexual assaults on women in London between 2002 and 2008.
At his trial, Croydon Crown Court heard he gave his lone victims drug-laced champagne, saying he was celebrating a big lottery or casino win, before attacking them in his London taxi.
Sarah Green, from the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said the justice secretary’s efforts were “very welcome”.
“Women have been singularly failed throughout this case, from initial investigations all the way through to the parole board decision,” she said.
She added that swift action was needed to review the risk Worboys poses to women’s safety and to “restore public confidence in the system’s ability to do justice and to protect”.
Labour MP Yvette Cooper tweeted that a legal review was needed, saying she had “deep, deep concerns” about the case after speaking to victims and their lawyers.
The Parole Board announced on 4 January that Worboys would be released from prison, leading to criticism from victims’ groups and representatives over the decision and the fact many of his victims were not informed in advance of it being made public.
The handling of Worboys’s release has already triggered a government review to look at how the Parole Board reaches its decisions.
New Conservative party chairman Brandon Lewis said he could understand the public outrage at Worboys’s release.
Mr Gauke would be doing everything he could to make sure Worboys “stays behind bars”, Mr Lewis told BBC One’s Andrew Marr show.
The Sunday Times reported that Mr Gauke’s possible intervention comes after four cabinet ministers warned that Worboys’s release might be unlawful because victims were not consulted.
A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “The secretary of state commissioned advice mid-last week on the plausibility and potential success in a judicial review; he would only be minded to move forward if there was a reasonable prospect of success.”
Labour’s London Mayor Sadiq Khan said in a tweet that he was “astonished” by the Parole Board’s decision, saying “it must listen to Worboys’s victims”.
“He should not be allowed to set foot in London,” he added.
Analysis: A scoping exercise
By Alex Forsyth, BBC political correspondent
There was a huge backlash to the Parole Board’s decision to release John Worboys; from those who thought it was the wrong decision, and from those who were critical about the way victims had been informed about it.
At this stage, David Gauke’s actions are just a scoping exercise, he won’t proceed unless he feels there are grounds to do so.
Nonetheless, this is significant. It is highly unusual for a justice secretary to intervene in the decisions of the Parole Board in this way, and that’s because the Parole Board is very deliberately independent of government.
It’s understood that Mr Gauke, who is new to the job of justice secretary, takes that independence very seriously and wants to maintain it, which is why at this stage he is just collecting information about the possibility of a judicial review.
Harriet Wistrich, a lawyer representing one of the victims from Worboys’s criminal trial and another complainant, said she had also been looking into the possibility of a judicial review.
Such a challenge would be unprecedented, she said, but at the very least her clients, who are both convinced Worboys remains a danger, deserve an explanation and an opportunity to be consulted.
The possible government intervention comes after the Crown Prosecution Service said it would not review the 93 cases that Worboys was not prosecuted over.
Parole Board chairman Nick Hardwick has said hearing the decision must have been “horrible” for the women, but the board was “confident” 60-year-old Worboys would not reoffend.
He said the fact some victims were not informed was a fault with the parole system, but the decision itself would have been carefully considered.